The court docket upheld the selections of the two lower courts, which had rightly disbelieved the statements of the plaintiff’s witnesses concerning the proof in the alleged oral gift. The absence of substantial proof to guidance the declare of an oral present led to the dismissal from the petitioner’s scenario. https://griffinwmuqr.bloggerbags.com/36350356/title-and-ownership-wakeel-in-karachi-for-dummies